T-Mobile also Gets Hit with Class Action Suit

A few days ago I made a post about the class action suite that has been certified against Verizon wireless. Now it seems that its T-Mobile turn to be nailed with a complaint. Nobody has told me that this is the season for class action suits or prosecute your Wireless carrier month.

The complaint against Verizon Wireless ordinated from the Early Termination fee they charged their customers. Their wireless contract or terms and conditions prohibits a customer from transferring into another carrier or wireless plan without paying a fee. On the other hand, the class action suit filed against T-Mobile involves text messages.

Enraged T-Mobile subscribers want justice for the charges that they have been made to pay for unwanted text messages. The class action suit was filed in the U.S. District Court in Seattle. They are accusing their carrier charges for text messages regardless of whether customers want the missives.

Here is a statement from plaintiffs who are representing the complainants,

"T-Mobile refuses to disable the texting messaging feature on its customers’ accounts, even when the customer has no interest in sending, or, more importantly, receiving text messages. Moreover, T-Mobile requires each of its customers who have not subscribed to one of T-Mobile’s Messaging Value Bundles to pay for each and every unsolicited text message they receive. In sum, T-Mobile, the party with the superior bargaining power, has carried out a wrongful business scheme regarding text messaging to deliberately cheat a large number of consumers out of individually small sums of money.”

This seems like a very serious accusation. Of course, I can sympathize with the sentiments of the subscribers. After all, nobody wants to be cheated. However, T-Mobile also has a policy concerning class action suits that is stated in their wireless contracts or Terms and Conditions. Check out this statement from their Terms and Conditions,

WHETHER IN COURT, SMALL CLAIMS COURT, OR ARBITRATION YOU AND WE MAY ONLY BRING CLAIMS AGAINST EACH OTHER IN AN INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AND NOT AS A CLASS REPRESENTATIVE OR A CLASS MEMBER IN A CLASS OR REPRESENTATIVE ACTION. NOTWITHSTANDING SEC. 22, IF A COURT OR ARBITRATOR DETERMINES IN A CLAIM BETWEEN YOU AND US THAT YOUR WAIVER OF ANY ABILITY TO PARTICIPATE IN CLASS OR REPRESENTATIVE ACTIONS IS UNENFORCEABLE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW, THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT WILL NOT APPLY, AND YOU AND WE AGREE THAT SUCH CLAIMS WILL BE RESOLVED BY A COURT OF APPROPRIATE JURISDICTION, OTHER THAN A SMALL CLAIMS COURT.

This statement is actually a waiver that is a part of the T-Mobile contract. However, with the certification of the complaint against Verizon Wireless, this complaint may also cause problems to T-Mobile. They may be forced to pay back the customers they have charged for these unwanted text messages.

The events in these recent weeks have certainly been interesting. Will the wireless contract disputes and other conflicts between wireless and customers continue to escalate? Well, I guess we'll see in the upcoming weeks. The consumers seems to be putting a lot of pressure on their carriers and we will see how they will respond.

So far, the spokespersons of the networks have released no comments regarding the class action suits they are facing. We'll just have to sit back and observes as the opposing groups go at it and hope that verything will still be fine when the dust settles.